-----------------------------------------------------------------

Hello, everybody, this is Dr. Beter. Today is September 12,
1975, and this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 4.

As usual, there is a great deal more going on right now than
meets the eye. The major media mislead the American people daily
simply by presenting only those portions of the truth about
events that add up to produce a desired impression. Thus you
can't hope to grasp the true significance of news events unless
and until you learn to analyze the scanty facts in the news for
yourself. Learn to separate fact from opinion. You are not
given enough real facts to come to your own clear-cut, logical
decisions except perhaps in the area of sports. Instead, the
gaps are filled in for you by commentary designed to lead you to
conclusions that are not really your own. This is why I am
trying to open your eyes to the way things really work and to
give you key information that you need to have.

To this end, I want to discuss the following three topics
today:

Topic #1--THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND "GOLD SALE AGREEMENT"
AND THE DETHRONING OF THE UNITED STATES DOLLAR

Topic #2--ASSASSINATION POLITICS AND SUBTLE MANEUVERINGS IN THE
COUNTDOWN TOWARD DICTATORSHIP

Topic #3--THE RAPIDLY MERGING OUTLINES OF THE PLANNED 1977 WAR IN
ASIA.

At the end I also hope to mention some brief hints about what
you, the individual concerned American, can do to help stem the
tide and save our beloved land.

Topic #1--In my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 2 for July 1975 I
discussed the setback which David Rockefeller experienced at the
June meeting of the "International Monetary Fund", or IMF.
Speaking through his agents in the United States Treasury, he had
expected to succeed in persuading the member nations of the IMF
to sell all of the IMF gold, and was ready to buy the IMF gold as
soon as it was sold. Much to David's surprise and chagrin he
failed in June 1975 because of French opposition based on their
own awareness of the true status of Fort Knox and America's gold
reserves. As I mentioned in that AUDIO LETTER, the Rockefeller
interests went to work in a feverish search for a means of
achieving their objective--that is, a decision to sell IMF gold
at the next IMF meeting in September, this month. And if you
paid any attention to the news early this month, you know that
this time the Rockefellers did achieve a hasty compromise
agreement. In a moment I will explain exactly what was decided
about potential gold sales at the early September meeting of the
IMF, but first I want you to notice the startling quid pro quo
which the Treasury accepted on behalf of David Rockefeller as the
price of selling the IMF gold.

For years now the United States Treasury has been debunking
the monetary role of gold as obsolete, barbaric, and no longer
needed. In this connection, the Treasury has been fighting for
years to bar Central Banks from buying gold on the free market.
The reason for this is to allow the interests controlled by David
Rockefeller to corner the gold for themselves while their
deliberately-produced runaway inflation ruins the rest of us
stuck with paper money that has no backing. But at the September
1975 IMF meeting this position which the United States has stuck
to uncompromisingly for years was suddenly abandoned. Why? What
was it that made the United States agree to let Central Banks buy
gold? They already had the right to sell it. What caused such a
total defeat for David Rockefeller and such a dramatic reversal
of a fundamental policy built up now for years?

My friends, what caused the result is the spreading effect of
our exposure of the Fort Knox Gold Scandal. The general American
public still doesn't know about it, thanks to the news blackout
imposed by CBS, ABC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the
Los Angeles Times, and other major media which are controlled and
intimidated by the Rockefeller Brothers themselves. But the most
knowledgeable people in the financial community here and abroad
increasingly do know that something is very fishy indeed about
the United States Treasury Department. In short, the heat is on!

Since we revealed the existence of the Central Core Vault in
July and explained its role in the gold theft and fraud at Fort
Knox, the Treasury knows that we know exactly what they have been
doing, and how. The Conspirators know that if my associates and
I ever are allowed to present our evidence in a court of law
before a grand jury or in a Congressional investigation, their
fate is sealed. Their game, therefore, is to try to keep that
from happening by keeping the public fooled and unaware of the
truth. To this end, the Rockefellers made their big concession
at the September IMF meeting in order to get some IMF gold
returned to the Treasury.

Under the terms of the Agreement, five-million ounces of IMF
gold is to be returned to the United States, from whence it came.
This gold was originally promised for sale to the "insiders"
within the Rockefeller circle, but now they wanted instead to
display or use it in gold auctions to keep the public fooled. In
this connection, on August 21, 1975, shortly before the latest
IMF meeting, the Treasury even held a well-publicized meeting
with private gold dealers to discuss the question of holding
auctions. This was pure propaganda and bluff, and intended to
lend weight to any future auctions of gold obtained from the IMF.
The frantic maneuverings to snatch some IMF gold for propaganda
auctions is simply a replay of what they did last December to
have a little gold to auction off. On December 9, 1974, the
Treasury illegally emptied the tiny "Exchange Stabilization Fund"
of its two-million ounces of gold, as I have mentioned in
previous tapes. That was done simply to have something for the
Treasury to sell in small propaganda auctions, since the rest of
our gold reserves were long gone.

With this important perspective in mind, listen please to what
the IMF did on August 31, 1975, at the beginning of their
so-called September meeting:

No. 1--The widely publicized "Gold Sale Agreement" of the IMF
is an agreement in principle, a conditional agreement. The IMF
is to meet again in January 1976 in Jamaica to discuss the
Exchange Rate question. If, and only if IMF members agree on
that in January, then the conditional Gold Sale Agreement, which
has just been announced, will take effect. The stakes are so
high for David Rockefeller and his partners in crime that I
predict agreement will be reached at the January meeting in
Jamaica. The political will is there. The IMF gold will then be
officially released, although I am informed that steps are
already being taken now behind the scenes, illegally and
prematurely, to take possession of the five-million ounces of
gold and put it back in Fort Knox.

By the way, there have been rumors lately that Mrs. Mary
Brooks, the Director of the United States Mint, has tendered her
resignation, but that it has not yet been accepted because it
would look so bad. There are indications that her superior said,
in effect, quote: "Just hang on for a few more months, Mary,
while we get this whole thing about Fort Knox out of the way.
Then you can go, if you like." Be that as it may, we had one of
our sources contact Mrs. Brooks, and here is what she said,
quote: "There is nothing amiss at Fort Knox. I was there
recently. I have never tendered my resignation, and I don't
intend to do so. I don't know why these rumors keep coming up."
Asked if she knew about the rapid retrieval elevator system to
the Central Core Vault, she did not deny it but just replied,
quote: "Those kind of rumors come along all the time." Our
source suggested to Mrs. Brooks that it would be a simple matter
to open Fort Knox wide open to prove Dr. Beter wrong and, quote:
"put an end to this matter once and for all." Her reply--and
this is her exact reply--and I quote: "Oh, no! It would take
weeks." All I can say to that, my friends, is: "Yes, Mary, it
will take weeks to get the five-million ounces of gold back in
Fort Knox." That is why I am informed there is some activity
going on right now in Fort Knox. Meanwhile Mary Brooks is trying
to brazen it out.

Returning to the IMF Gold Sale Agreement though, I should
point out one other thing: Should there fail to be an agreement
about Exchange Rates by the IMF in January in Jamaica, an
unlikely event, than we will be back to Square One on IMF gold
sales. Should that happen, David Rockefeller and his fellow
"insiders" will have used the IMF gold sales decision as a scare
tactic throughout this fall of 1975 to run down gold prices and
take all the gold they can out of weak hands. Also, they made
billions of dollars going "short." When the public becomes aware
of this, gold prices will start up again.

No. 2--The interim or conditional Gold Sale Agreement
specifies the following:

Of the approximately 150-million ounces of gold now owned by the
IMF, one-sixth or 25-million ounces is to be sold on the open
market or to member Central Banks. The latter is what will
actually occur. True to Rockefeller tradition, by the way, this
IMF gold sale to suit their own purposes has been painted as a
philanthropic move to raise money to aid poor and developing
nations.

Another one-sixth or 25-million ounces is to be returned to
member nations of the IMF in proportion to the amounts of gold
each nation originally contributed. Each nation may then keep or
sell this returned gold, but you can bet they will keep it.
Their own citizens will hang their Central Bankers if they don't.

Under this clause the United States is to receive about
five-million ounces worth about $700,000,000 at current market
prices. This amount, I am informed, has already been promised to
the "insiders", but events may undo this when the Fort Knox Gold
Scandal breaks nationally and world-wide. It is this
five-million ounces of gold, equal to only about two percent (2%)
of what the United States Treasury officially claims to have,
that the Conspirators want desperately to get their hands on in
case they need it for propaganda auctions or even another
carefully-staged "peep show" at Fort Knox.

The remaining two-thirds of the IMF gold, or about 100,000,000
ounces, is to "stay put" in the IMF for the time being. There it
will remain as backing for the so-called "Special Drawing
Rights", or SDR's, of the IMF. The SDR is to become the new
international monetary unit or standard of measure, the
yardstick; and then the other strong currencies that now make up
part of the basket of the 16 currencies which constitute the
SDR's, will be the reserve currencies of the future, at least for
the next two years. The dollar, therefore, is giving up its
sovereignty as a sole reserve currency. The joker in this deck
is that over half of an SDR is made up of the American dollar and
British pound sterling, both of which lack gold backing. In the
tremendous inflation ahead, the SDR will therefore be hobbling
around on one leg with its only real support consisting of the
strong gold-backed currencies which comprise less than half its
face value.

No. 3--and very important. Beginning January 1976 the IMF
members have agreed not, repeat NOT, to affix an official gold
price for a period of two years, provided the January 1976
agreement on Exchange Rates takes place. This is exactly the
development I have been warning about for over a year, based on
information from my own confidential sources. They are behind
schedule in obtaining this agreement, but the agreement itself is
precisely on track. Once it is in place, they can easily make up
for lost time in their plan to visit economic catastrophe on the
United States and the world.

What the IMF agreed to in principle is to allow its members,
including the United States, to ask their respective governments
to abolish the official price of gold, which is now $42.22 an
ounce, once the Exchange Rate agreement is reached in January
1976. This means that for the following two years there will be
only a "market price" for gold, subject only to supply and demand
plus massive massages by the Rockefeller interests to cause the
price of gold to skyrocket. In other words, gold will be going
private for two years starting in January 1976. The gold zoom
signal of $180 an ounce, which I explained in my AUDIO BOOK
recorded in October 1974, will be penetrated and cataclysmic
inflation and economic chaos will erupt. After two years of
this, with the economy of the world and especially of the United
States in smoking ruins, David Rockefeller--the man who
orchestrated the whole thing in the first place--presently plans
to call an "International Monetary Conference" to at last restore
gold to its traditional monetary role. David's plan is to
officially repeg gold then at $2,000 an ounce--twenty times the
current official price of $42.22 an ounce!

No. 4--After the two-year period just mentioned, according to
the Gold Sale Agreement just reached by the IMF, Central Banks
will be allowed to buy all the gold they want. As I have already
pointed out, this complete reversal of a key feature of the
Treasury's long standing gold-debunking campaign is directly
traceable to the steadily building pressure of the Fort Knox Gold
Scandal and the desperate need of the Conspirators to keep it
covered up.

No. 5--Until January 1976 no sales of gold will be made by the
IMF to world gold markets or to Central Banks at market prices.
It would not yet be legal to do so, but I fully expect that
agreement will be reached at Jamaica in January, and that IMF
gold sales will then take place according to plans. Thus the
United States dollar is now way over-valued.

The United States Treasury is most anxious to get its house
back in order, in appearance at least, to prevent the public from
becoming aware that Fort Knox is truly empty of its gold. The
Treasury now holds less than 800,000 ounces of gold--a mere
pittance left over from the 2,000,000 ounces it illegally took
from the Exchange Stabilization Fund on December 9, 1974. The
rest was used for the propaganda auctions by the Treasury in
January and June of this year.

Gold fever will spread across the land in the near future as
soon as the full significance of the IMF action is widely
understood, and then the only questions will be not the price but
the availability of gold. The gold market today is very thin as
it is, and the "insiders" had to scare the weak sisters in order
to make them disgorge their holdings.

As of now, David Rockefeller still plans for gold to be pegged
at $2,000 an ounce, and for the new SDR's to be the standard unit
of measure. The United States dollar will lose its status as a
world currency reserve. Even now David Rockefeller's Chase
Manhattan Bank is already linking some of its loans to SDR's.
After all, who should know better than David that dollars are to
be avoided?

For the next two years after January 1976, those countries
having gold in their Central Banks will be able to enjoy a fast
markup in the value of their gold reserves of 20 to 1. Can you
imagine!--20 to 1. Therefore during that period, Central Banks
will buy up at market prices the 25,000,000 ounces that will be
for sale by the IMF. That gold will never reach the private gold
market at all. But the United States has been deliberately made
gold poor by the Rockefeller Brothers.

Having no gold left of any significance, we are now in the
same leaky boat as Britain. And look what is happening to
Britain, which is already on the road to advanced socialism!
Cataclysmic inflation, deepening unemployment, and social and
economic upheaval on the way to dictatorship are in store for all
of us soon if the gold situation is not rectified. And so, my
friends, we are in a race against time. David Rockefeller and
his collaborators in and out of the Treasury seek delay, delay,
delay. They want to use the IMF gold and other tricks to keep
the American people fooled until it is too late. Time,
unfortunately, is on their side. Those of us who would like to
see our nation saved, on the other hand, are pressing with every
means at our disposal for a full, open, honest INVESTIGATION of
the whole thing without further delay.

In this connection, I want to read some telling words from the
front page of the Daily News Digest for the week of September 1,
1975. (Their address, by the way, is: P. O. Box 27496, Phoenix,
Arizona 85061.) The headline is just one word: "WHY?" I now
quote:

"The Fort Knox gold story is far from dead. There is something
rotten, and the stink has spread across the land like a fog.
Thousands of readers have followed our series closely. Like
them, we have waited in vain for satisfactory answers to
questions raised by Dr. Peter David Beter and his associate, Ed
Durell. An exchange of letters with the United States Bureau of
the Mint has produced nothing but double talk.

The key question regarding the Central Core Vault still remains
a mystery. Is the gold there or isn't it?

Why is it so difficult to send a delegation to Fort Knox, open
the Vault and reveal its content--or lack of content? Why have
no members of Congress taken it upon themselves to settle this
matter? Is courage such a missing virtue in Washington that this
can't be or won't be done?!

Why has the nation's press avoided the story with an intensity
that is amazing? Is this not perhaps the biggest news story in
the civilized history of the world? It certainly has that
possibility. An evil group of individuals that can loot a
nation's Treasury, as has been charged, to the tune of
$11,000,000,000 certainly deserves some attention, doesn't it?

And the radio and TV industry didn't even mention the initial
charges, and covered only the "peep show" staged at Fort Knox
last September.

But the newspapers, where are they? Why the blackout on the
Fort Knox story? Is there some powerful force that scares them
into submission? Or would they lose so much advertising that
they can't run the story? Or do the major editors think the
story is so outrageous as to merit no attention? Outrageousness
certainly didn't prevent Jane Fonda and others from getting
front-page coverage!

Yes, something stinks. IS THE GOLD THERE OR ISN'T IT? Which of
our Congressmen has the guts to find out?"

Finally, here is an item for you to think about if you are
tempted to swallow the Rockefeller propaganda about the
swaggering economic power of the Arabs and oil-producing states:

On September 5, 1975, a reporter posed the following question to
Dr. Abdul-Rahman Al-Atteqi, Minister of Finance of Kuwait, at the
National Press Club, quote: "None of the oil-producing states
spoke during the World Bank and IMF meetings. Why not?"

Dr. Al-Atteqi answered, quote:

"Addressing people seems to be of no meaning. If the United
Nations or World Bank meetings had a time to listen exactly as
good listeners should, everyone would speak, but most of the
speeches just go into the air. Nobody hears it--whispering, most
of the delegates out of the room--and then it is a text in a
book. If it happens, sometimes somebody reads it. This is why.
And secondly, it is known who runs the policy of the Monetary
System of the world, and we cannot for the time being compete
with them. We are in their hands. So this is a fact. We have
to live with it unless we break through--and we are looking for
that time."

His answer met with knowing applause. It expresses not only the
predicament of the oil-producing nations: it expresses yours and
mine as well.

Topic #2--On September 5, 1975, in Sacramento, California, a
dress rehearsal was held for the assassination of our figurehead
president, Gerald Ford. A young woman named Lynette Fromme got
to within two feet of the President before being stopped by a
Secret Service agent. As she was bundled off by the Secret
Service with a look of horrified surprise on her face, she
reportedly shouted: "It didn't go off!"

The very next day the news media were filled with the entirely
predictable conclusion of officials connected with the case.
Miss Fromme, they assured us, had acted alone. The possibility
of a conspiracy--that "dirty word"--was quickly pooh-poohed and
discounted. True, she had been given the gun by someone else,
but that couldn't mean anything. And, yes, her landlady did
reportedly say that just lately Miss Fromme had suddenly started
paying her rent with $100 bills, but that can't be anything but
coincidence. To give due credit to the officials involved
though, it should be mentioned that some of them did become
predictably excited about one thing--namely, the often-stated
need to disarm the populace under the banner of "gun control."
One official even ranted that this is so acute and so immediate
as to call for, quote: "wartime measures."

Well, everybody, it so happens that the incident on September
5 was not intended to injure President Ford. On July 17 and 18,
1975, I said in a speech at the Santa Monica Civic Center in
California, and I quote: "By September 1975 we will know if
Rockefeller is to be stopped. Some very important developments
are in the making." By this I was referring to the all-out power
struggle that is now going on out of the public view, and the
potentially decisive importance of this month, September 1975, in
the Rockefeller timetable for Dictatorship in America. This
power struggle, though it is well hidden from the general public,
is escalating to the vicious level of assassination politics
which burst onto the American scene twelve years ago with the
murder of President John F. Kennedy. Assassinations have been a
recurring part of the American scene ever since, including those
of Dr. Martin Luther King, Robert F. Kennedy, and recently Jimmy
Hoffa, among others. And this volcano of violence threatens to
erupt yet again, now, as rival factions within and close to the
Rockefeller camp jockey for position in the Dictatorship now
forming.

Last month, by the way, in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 3 I
revealed for the first time the truth about how and why President
Kennedy was killed. The response to my comments on that subject
has been so overwhelming that I believe the following footnote is
worth mentioning here.

As you will recall, I revealed last month that President
Kennedy was riding in an elaborately-rigged limousine--the murder
car. He was killed not by a sniper but by a well-aimed blast
from inside the car. That blast was in all probability set off
by a radio signal from outside the car by someone in a position
to tell just when to do it. My confidential technical sources
now believe they know where the radio signal came from.

If you have followed the various accounts that have come out
about the J.F.K. assassination over the years, you have probably
heard of the mysterious man with the umbrella. This was an
onlooker who was right on the scene of the shooting in Dallas.
Reportedly he abruptly raised his umbrella and opened it just as
the President's car went by, and at that moment the several
snipers all began firing. After a few seconds, he is said to
have closed the umbrella and put it back down, and the firing
stopped. He then melted into the crowd and quickly vanished.
Others have theorized that the man with the umbrella was the
signal man who used the umbrella to coordinate the firing of the
snipers for maximum confusion and effect. I believe this is
correct, but based on my own confidential information, I believe
he also had the additional role of sending the radio signal to
set off the fatal blast inside the murder car at the height of
the din from the snipers. The upraised umbrella would have made
a perfect radio antenna to transmit the signal, and the signal
itself could have been triggered with a button on the umbrella
handle. It was important though to avoid focusing suspicion on
the murder car itself, which was destroyed within 48 hours.
Therefore an ordinary umbrella looking like the one used by the
mysterious onlooker, was no doubt left somewhere nearby for
people to find, while the real umbrella equipped by the CIA with
a tiny radio transmitter, was spirited away. When the ordinary
look-alike umbrella was found discarded on the scene, the natural
reaction would be to say, "Look here. I guess the guy with the
umbrella got rid of it so it wouldn't hamper his get away." And
that would be that.

At any rate, we stand on a threshold of a possible new era of
assassination, intimidation, and misinformation of the public
even worse than that which followed the Kennedy assassination.
The September 5 dress rehearsal for Ford's assassination was for
two purposes. First, it was to give him a not-so-subtle hint
that he had better fulfill his deal with Nelson Rockefeller and
vacate the White House soon - or else. Second, it was staged on
camera, you will notice, for the benefit of you and me--the
public.

This incident is a part of a multi-faceted campaign to
condition your mind to accept the departure of the Fords from the
public scene one way or another. Witness, for example, how CBS,
which is thoroughly under the thumb of the Rockefellers, set up
Betty Ford as a clay pigeon on the August 10, 1975, CBS
television show "60 MINUTES." There Betty Ford bared her private
life and thoughts in public in a way which has brought down
ridicule and shame on her head. In this and many other ways, the
Fords are being belittled in the public mind, so that our first
appointed President won't be missed when he is replaced by our
second.

Yes, the behind-the-scenes power struggle which has so far
kept Nelson Rockefeller from seizing the presidency which he had
planned to do by June, three months ago, is beginning to erupt
into the open. What we are witnessing is the latest phase of an
elaborate multistepped coup d'etat with its major milestones
spaced roughly a year apart so that public apprehensions will
largely die out between steps.

Just over three years ago the coup d'etat began with the
Watergate break-in. Two years ago Vice-President Spiro Agnew was
eliminated from the scene. This activated the 25th Amendment,
which Nelson Rockefeller had manipulated into the Constitution
several years before to be used in the planned coup. Just over
one year ago Richard Nixon became the first President in American
history to resign--the victim of Watergate, which was conceived
by Nelson Rockefeller, engineered by his CIA, and given a final
assist in the form of blackmail by Nelson Rockefeller's long-time
agent, Henry Kissinger. Now it has been another year and it is
time for the next step--namely the ousting of figurehead Gerald
Ford from the White House so that our president-in-fact, Nelson
Rockefeller, can make himself President in name also. And
Rockefeller must do this soon because he is becoming more and
more unpopular by the day. If this is accomplished according to
plan, the coup d'etat itself will be complete.

After that, there will only be one step left to go--our
ratification of Nelson Rockefeller's status as our DICTATOR on
election day November 1976, just over one year from now. On that
day we are to return our then incumbent president, Nelson
Rockefeller, to the White House and at the same time we are to
accept, by national referendum, the new Rockefeller
Constitution--which has already been written and which will give
him a nine-year term as our first Dictator. Every possible
avenue is being pursued in order to pave the way for this
bicentennial death of our Republic! Not the least of these
preparations involve the conditioning of your mind through the
massive controls over the mass media exercised by the
Rockefellers. For example, various component provisions embodied
in the secret "NEW CONSTITUTION" keep popping up here and there,
seemingly at random but actually as parts of a well coordinated
master public relations war being waged on the unsuspecting
American public by the Rockefellers.

To cite just one example--and they are everywhere these days
if your eyes are open--there is the article in a recent issue of
Business Week entitled, quote: "The big new push for federal
chartering of corporations." Business Week, it should be
mentioned, is published by McGraw-Hill, one of the hundreds of
major companies under Rockefeller control. McGraw-Hill is a
particularly useful voice for the Rockefellers, since it
publishes a series of special industry magazines which
established high prestige long ago and are therefore very
influential now. Anyway, the article says that there is a
rapidly emerging push to replace State chartering of corporations
in America by federal chartering, and that surprisingly some of
the most powerful backing for this move is coming from leaders of
major corporations themselves, such as General Electric. The
article fails to point out though that all of these big
corporations cited are Rockefeller outfits, and federal
chartering is one of the keystones of the corporate-socialist
economic structure spelled out in the new Rockefeller
Constitution. The impetus for this big new federal chartering
campaign is stated to be a couple of Supreme Court decisions
which may look (quote) "conservative" on their face since they
effectively removed the federal influence over corporations that
had long been exerted through Rule 10-B (5) of the Securities
Exchange Commission. This ruling looks, at first glance, to be a
move away from federal meddling, but its actual purpose is to
whip up sentiment in Congress to pass legislation which will go
much further than the old SEC rule.

This is a perfect example in which the real purposes of
political actions are the exact opposite of the surface
appearance. And if anyone doubts that the Supreme Court is
knowingly being guided to do the Rockefeller will, just consider,
for example, our Chief Justice Warren Earl Burger. One of the
ways in which he established the credentials which led to his
Supreme Court appointment, was through his contribution as a
so-called "outside expert" to the writing of the secret new
Rockefeller Constitution. The idea to eliminate the right of
trial by jury, which the "NEW CONSTITUTION" does, came from
Burger.

The art of politics, as it is practiced at the national level
today in America, has been reduced to continual deception and
trickery. A perfect example is the plan which has been concocted
by Nelson Rockefeller and his long-time friend and supporter,
George Meany, to recast Rockefeller's image in a conservative
mold. Imagine! This has become necessary because it is now the
Conservatives who hold the balance of political power in America.
No doubt you've noticed the wide publicity which has been given
lately to the supposedly conservative views which are preached by
Nelson Rockefeller these days in his speeches. Never mind that
his entire public career for more than 40 years is a sordid
history of well-documented but little-known piracy against the
American ship of state. Never mind that he has always espoused,
quote "fiscal integrity", and that without exception this has
been translated into higher taxes, increasing public debt,
swelling unemployment, and mushrooming welfare rolls. And, never
mind that his public career is littered with broken promises and
double crosses. He now says things which the
Rockefeller-controlled news media label "conservative" so we are
to take them at face value.

But many Americans will not be taken in by Rockefeller's own
statements alone, so going along now on a parallel road as a
fellow traveler is one George Meany. Meany has lately made a
great show of not letting the longshoremen in his AFL-CIO load
wheat bound for Russia supposedly until the American consumer is
protected against inflation and whatnot. This stand has been
painted in the news media as evidence of Conservatism on his
part; but now that this political harvest has been reaped, the
grain is being loaded once again and sent on its way to
Rockefeller's Mother Russia.

Just to enhance this conservative image, Meany is also
throwing snide remarks at Henry Kissinger. Kissinger has now
done his job for Rockefeller and is about to be thrown to the
wolves so as to appease the Conservatives and to fool them into
thinking they are gaining ground. Thus Meany is building a
conservative, anti-Communist image as fast as possible; and since
he is not a self-serving politician, this apparent development of
a conservative streak will be taken by many as genuine. He will
therefore be in a perfect position, when the time is ripe, to
throw his arm around Nelson Rockefeller and give him his full
political support. Rockefeller will thus be transformed into an
instant Conservative, anti-Communist, anti-Soviet in the eyes of
many trusting Americans.

One of the most diabolically clever and cruel twists in this
plan has been the way in which Nelson Rockefeller through his
agent George Meany, used exiled Russian author Alexander
Solzhenitsyn to further his own political plans. Very few
Americans grasped what happened, and Solzhenitsyn himself has no
inkling at all of the treachery that surrounded his recent visit
to the United States. Solzhenitsyn is a true and great Russian
patriot who has suffered terrible things at the hands of the
imperialist, Communist regime that now enslaves his people. He
would never have knowingly permitted himself to be used by the
very people who perpetually finance and sustain the Russian
Communist police state, but he did not reckon with the craftiness
of the Rockefeller Brothers. Meany said in his introduction to
one of Solzhenitsyn's speeches under AFL-CIO sponsorship that
Solzhenitsyn is, quote: "a voice that demands to be heard; a
voice that will not be denied."

The Rockefeller approach to anything they cannot suppress is
to harness it, and that is what they did to Solzhenitsyn. They
harnessed him. First, the United States Government agreed with
Russia not to accord him any official recognition before he was
released. Hence the widely-publicized snub by President Ford.
Next, George Meany latched on to him even before he came out of
Russia and sewed up a commitment from the famous Russian exile to
speak under AFL-CIO auspices in the United States. Then when he
reached America, his great AFL-CIO speaking tour consisted of
only two speeches--one in Washington, D.C., and the other in New
York City. As a result, Solzhenitsyn's actual words, which I
believe every American should hear, were heard by very few
people. But the fact that he had spoken under George Meany's
sponsorship was publicized nation-wide in the Rockefeller news
media, and this explains why the New York Times gave it broad
coverage. The net result: A few people heard the truth from
Solzhenitsyn, but vast numbers of people were deceived by all
this into thinking: George Meany deserves the Conservative label
now being stuck to him by the Rockefeller public relations
machine. A more convincing lie would be difficult to imagine.

I now turn briefly to Topic #3.

In my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 3, last month, I revealed that
major revisions are in the works for up-coming war plans. These
changes stemmed from the actions of Indira Gandhi to stop the
Rockefeller take-over of India by way of their CIA. The
Rockefellers want to absorb India into their empire before
proceeding to World War III, and are therefore modifying their
foreign intrigues accordingly. Their plans I revealed some time
ago for World War III--which is really to be half a world war
with America as the main battleground--have not been abandoned
altogether. They have simply been put on a back burner while the
focus shifts to India, which is the last remaining chunk of the
old British Empire that is not yet in Rockefeller hands. The
emerging build-up to war in Asia, which is now targeted to start
about March 1977 according to the Rockefeller plans, is a complex
thing and is being largely ignored by most observers right now.
I plan to speak more about it in up-coming AUDIO LETTERS, but I
feel you should have at least a thumbnail sketch now.

To begin with, the Helsinki Accord signed recently by Ford,
Brezhnev, and leaders of more than 30 other nations had only one
real effect. It formally ratified Russian conquests in Eastern
Europe regardless of all the official protestations to the
contrary. That's why Soviet Party boss Brezhnev had tears of joy
in his eyes after all had signed it. It gave Russia a secure
border in Western Europe, and the ink was hardly dry when Russian
attention turned eastward to China. Well-orchestrated attacks on
Peking and the foreign policy of Chairman Mao have appeared not
only in high-level organs of the Soviet Press but also in Soviet
satellites such as East Germany, Bulgaria, and others.

Russia fears that China might become the leader of the Third
World of developing nations, therefore Russia is trying to
encircle China and has been greatly helped in recent years by the
Kissinger foreign policy which has handed over Southeast Asia to
Russia--not to China, as some people think--and which has
effectively neutralized American influence elsewhere along the
Chinese encirclement perimeter. The encirclement threat to
China, in turn, is giving impetus to the forging of a
Sino-Japanese Axis, which is forming right now.

Finally, this whole situation and its tensions are such that
the Rockefellers hope and expect to turn it to their own
purposes. Through their thorough control of Japan, an avenue is
readily available to guide events toward precipitation of the
planned war against India on schedule. This is especially so
since John D. Rockefeller III, the real ruler of Japan today,
learned all about such things long ago when he helped maneuver
the Japanese into attacking Pearl Harbor. Finally, once India is
attacked, Russia will enter on India's side and America will be
used as a factory to supply Russia. The Rockefellers stand to
make lots of money through their involvement on both sides as
usual; and they expect to pick up the pieces in India after the
smoke clears.

And so, my friends, on and on it goes unless we stop it! More
and more people are now asking: What can I do? I plan to say
more about this in the future, but let me just give you these
brief hints for now, if I may:

First--you must inform yourself. Know what is going on so you
will know what needs to be corrected.

Second--Inform others, and never think anything is too small
to do. Talk to a friend, a neighbor, write a letter to the
Editor.

Third--Put pressure on your elected officials--locally and at
the State level, as well as Congress. Call or write--again, and
again, and again, and again until they learn you mean business
and cannot be shrugged off with routine, polite, meaningless
replies.

Finally--Be specific about what you want your elected
officials to do to straighten things out.

In this regard I strongly recommend that you focus your energies
on the FORT KNOX GOLD SCANDAL. Those who have perpetrated this
fantastic crime and cover-up are now running scared behind the
scenes. The Fort Knox affair is the one most dangerous issue for
the Conspirators, who are trying to trap us all in a
DICTATORSHIP, so do all you can to help us break it into the open
so that the truth can be proven.

Until next month, then, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and God
bless each and every one of you.